Review and ranking methodology
Our process is designed to distinguish a useful directory listing from a tested review and to keep commercial recommendations inside explicit eligibility gates.
1. Availability
We resolve the recorded domain, note redirects and remove down or parked products from recommendations.
2. Product classification
We look for a material user-facing AI capability. Listings are labeled AI tool, hybrid, traditional adult site or pending review.
3. Public evidence
We check official product, pricing and policy pages and record the URLs and review date when a listing receives an editorial pass.
4. Verification limits
We state what was not tested, such as account creation, payment, generation, playback, downloads, mobile apps or encryption claims.
5. Recommendations
Eligible AI and hybrid products are ordered using current health, anonymized engagement, approved revenue and editorial priority signals.
6. Ratings
A star score is not considered verified until a published review record supports it. Imported catalogue ratings do not qualify.
Corrections and freshness
Prices, policies and product availability change. Visitors should confirm final checkout terms on the provider site. Material corrections should update the listing evidence and review date rather than silently preserving an outdated claim.